(April 2022)
The
liability exposure for mobile equipment is covered under both the Business Auto
Policy (BAP) and under the Commercial General Liability (CGL) Coverage Form,
but the forms are designed so that the same equipment should not be covered
under both at the same time. Because of the confusion this can cause, in this
article we will attempt to explain when mobile equipment is covered under which
form and why.
The
definition of mobile equipment in both forms is exhaustive but not inclusive.
This is because of the usage of the term "types." The American
Heritage College Dictionary defines it to mean several things that have in
common traits or characteristics that distinguish them as a group. It is also
an example or model that has the ideal features of a group or class. The
equipment in the definition of mobile equipment is not exhaustive but
illustrates and gives examples of the "types" of equipment to be
treated this way.
Note: This definition is the same in both
coverage forms.
Mobile
Equipment is any of the following types of land vehicles. Any machinery or
equipment that is attached to the vehicle is also considered mobile equipment:
Notice the difference in this wording
from the above. The equipment is not required to be designed for off road use.
As an example, a pickup truck that is used only on the premises is mobile
equipment – not auto.
This item is subject to additional
limitations. Vehicles that are self-propelled and that have any of the
following items permanently attached are auto and not mobile equipment:
An auto is a land motor vehicle, trailer, or semi-trailer that
is designed for travel on public roads. Machinery and equipment that are
attached to the auto are also considered auto.
Other land
vehicles that would not be considered autos are defined as auto if they are
subject to compulsory or financial responsibility laws or motor vehicle laws
wherever they are principally garaged or licensed.
Mobile equipment
is not auto.
Note:
This definition is the
same in both coverage forms.
Reviewing the two definitions together clarifies when vehicles
that appear to be mobile equipment are actually auto. Vehicles that appear to
meet the definition of mobile equipment are considered auto in the following
situations:
1. If the vehicle is self-propelled and has one or more of
the following types of permanently attached equipment:
Note: Vehicles with these devices are auto when the vehicle is
on an automobile or truck chassis but are mobile equipment when the vehicle is
a trailer or other non-self-propelled equipment.
2. If the vehicle would be considered mobile equipment except
that it is subject to a state compulsory or financial responsibility motor
vehicle law where it is garaged. This means that even though the piece of
equipment meets all other definitions of mobile equipment, it is defined as an
auto due to the individual state licensing rules. This means that what is considered
mobile equipment in one state is considered auto in another.
1.
CG 00 01–Commercial General Liability Coverage Form contains two exclusions to
prevent duplication.
2.
CA 00 01–Business Auto Coverage Form provides coverage in two parts of Section
I–Covered Autos.
There are no exclusions on the auto
policy because only liability for autos within the Description of Auto
Designation Symbols is provided.
Related Articles:
CA 00 01–Business Auto Coverage Form Analysis
CG 00 01 and CG 00 02–Commercial General Liability
Coverage Forms Analysis
The current editions of both coverage
forms are designed and arranged to make the wording and coverage provided
consistent and compatible. This approach provides coverage under one of the
coverage forms under circumstances that the other coverage form excludes and
vice-versa. As a result, the insured should not be concerned with gaps in
coverage. However, it is extremely important to understand how revisions and
updates that occur with each new edition of each of these coverage forms impact
the coverage. This works well when all insurance companies are using the most
current edition of ISO forms. However, companies often delay adopting edition
updates. It is therefore important to compare the CGL and BAP coverage form
edition dates to determine if the dates are current and, if not, review the
definitions and exclusions described above for possible gaps that may occur
because of the differences in edition dates.